Mustang V6 real world 1/4 mile times exposed. where's Lee?
Question:
>Man don’t be an idiot, v6 mustangs pre 99 are absolute DOGS. Even the ford >guys will agree. Manual v6s are 16 second cars, autos are 17+.. I mean come >on, list the mods these cars have. I’ve been in 7-8 mustang v6s and they >are some of the slowest cars on the planet, barely able to keep up with >SUVs.
Take note Crush.
Response:
>Take note Crush.
I’ll chose to believe what 5 different people got. Bling Bling! See the ‘REALITY CHECK’ AD BY EIBACH! A MUST SEE! http://members.home.net/crush/reality-check Over 38,000 people educated! UPDATED! Honda Civic vs. Ford Mustang FAQ http://members.home.net/crush Smart ->Newbie Steve, Lee C, Brian Y. Cho, Clint Law, Alan Flawed ->samagon, ConANDave, mike, edscholl, Andrew, Mike Schwartz
Response:
It only had an intake when I measured that. — Gareth 98 Honda Civic Si Honda Acura Drivers Association http://hada.homepage.ca
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I’m sure if I can pull a 16.3 that Lee can pull low 16’s. > But isn’t your car modified? > Bling Bling! See the ‘REALITY CHECK’ AD BY EIBACH! A MUST SEE! > http://members.home.net/crush/reality-check > Over 38,000 people educated! > UPDATED! Honda Civic vs. Ford Mustang FAQ > http://members.home.net/crush > Smart ->Newbie Steve, Lee C, Brian Y. Cho, Clint Law, Alan > Flawed ->samagon, ConANDave, mike, edscholl, Andrew, Mike Schwartz
Response:
>Take note Crush. >I’ll chose to believe what 5 different people got.
Ok, since Pee-Pee boy will recite what some dedicated ford enthusiests say about their cars, I’ll quote a Motor Trend test time. Ford mustang 3.8 Automatic. 0-60 9.9 seconds hehe… Chevrolet Silverado 94 0-60 9.5 seconds how sad…
Response:
- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Automatic V6 Mustangs. No 1999 autos tested. > -=1998=- > Jason C. Watts (G-Tech) 16.03 sec. > ChuckSD (Carlsbad,CA Strip) 16.23 sec. > -=1996=- > Jack Howton (Houston Raceway Park) 16.49 sec. > howton69 (Houston Raceway Park) 16.64 sec. > -=1994=- > Garrett Billan (Viking Int’l Raceway) 16.21sec. > AVERAGE = 16.29 sec. > So we have established that a real world 1/4 mile time for the > automatic is about 16.29 for the OLD V6. This isn’t the newly tuned > V6.
Hee hee… no way those cars can run low 16s without mods on an automatic transmission and only 150HP. So are those really automatics? or do they have mods? Who is your source? > Anyhow. Lee Cao says his Accord is faster and get’s ‘low’ 16 sec. > times. Well, so do the old V6’s. So now we have a problem. I don’t > know what to think.
Not just low 16, but 16.0 flat. > Maybe if Lee put a quart of Rogaine into gas tank, he could do a > better 1/4 mile time. Lee could say that he is not the only person > that a got a 16 sec 1/4 mile time, but he’s also a client… (that > didn’t make sense at all) > Anyway. I really don’t have enough evidence to pass judgement on which > car is faster. Lee has already passed judgement long ago and I expect > that. But I simply don’t have enough evidence yet. How am I supposed > to find real world Accord V6 times? I can’t so we will have to go by > fantasy magazine reviews and Lee’s.. ehem.. real world claims.
How is my real world claim any less valid than the real world claim you get from others? > Bling Bling! See the ‘REALITY CHECK’ AD BY EIBACH! A MUST SEE! > http://members.home.net/crush/reality-check > Over 38,000 people educated! > UPDATED! Honda Civic vs. Ford Mustang FAQ > http://members.home.net/crush > Smart ->Newbie Steve, Lee C, Brian Y. Cho, Clint Law, Alan > Flawed ->samagon, ConANDave, mike, edscholl, Andrew, Mike Schwartz
– Lee Cao – www.leecao.com
Response:
>I’m sure if I can pull a 16.3 that Lee can pull low 16’s.
But isn’t your car modified? Bling Bling! See the ‘REALITY CHECK’ AD BY EIBACH! A MUST SEE! http://members.home.net/crush/reality-check Over 38,000 people educated! UPDATED! Honda Civic vs. Ford Mustang FAQ http://members.home.net/crush Smart ->Newbie Steve, Lee C, Brian Y. Cho, Clint Law, Alan Flawed ->samagon, ConANDave, mike, edscholl, Andrew, Mike Schwartz
Response:
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Automatic V6 Mustangs. No 1999 autos tested. >-=1998=- >Jason C. Watts (G-Tech) 16.03 sec. >ChuckSD (Carlsbad,CA Strip) 16.23 sec. >-=1996=- >Jack Howton (Houston Raceway Park) 16.49 sec. >howton69 (Houston Raceway Park) 16.64 sec. >-=1994=- >Garrett Billan (Viking Int’l Raceway) 16.21sec. >AVERAGE = 16.29 sec.
Man don’t be an idiot, v6 mustangs pre 99 are absolute DOGS. Even the ford guys will agree. Manual v6s are 16 second cars, autos are 17+.. I mean come on, list the mods these cars have. I’ve been in 7-8 mustang v6s and they are some of the slowest cars on the planet, barely able to keep up with SUVs.
Response:
I’m sure if I can pull a 16.3 that Lee can pull low 16’s. — Gareth 98 Honda Civic Si Honda Acura Drivers Association http://hada.homepage.ca
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Automatic V6 Mustangs. No 1999 autos tested. > -=1998=- > Jason C. Watts (G-Tech) 16.03 sec. > ChuckSD (Carlsbad,CA Strip) 16.23 sec. > -=1996=- > Jack Howton (Houston Raceway Park) 16.49 sec. > howton69 (Houston Raceway Park) 16.64 sec. > -=1994=- > Garrett Billan (Viking Int’l Raceway) 16.21sec. > AVERAGE = 16.29 sec. > So we have established that a real world 1/4 mile time for the > automatic is about 16.29 for the OLD V6. This isn’t the newly tuned > V6. > Anyhow. Lee Cao says his Accord is faster and get’s ‘low’ 16 sec. > times. Well, so do the old V6’s. So now we have a problem. I don’t > know what to think. > Maybe if Lee put a quart of Rogaine into gas tank, he could do a > better 1/4 mile time. Lee could say that he is not the only person > that a got a 16 sec 1/4 mile time, but he’s also a client… (that > didn’t make sense at all) > Anyway. I really don’t have enough evidence to pass judgement on which > car is faster. Lee has already passed judgement long ago and I expect > that. But I simply don’t have enough evidence yet. How am I supposed > to find real world Accord V6 times? I can’t so we will have to go by > fantasy magazine reviews and Lee’s.. ehem.. real world claims. > Bling Bling! See the ‘REALITY CHECK’ AD BY EIBACH! A MUST SEE! > http://members.home.net/crush/reality-check > Over 38,000 people educated! > UPDATED! Honda Civic vs. Ford Mustang FAQ > http://members.home.net/crush > Smart ->Newbie Steve, Lee C, Brian Y. Cho, Clint Law, Alan > Flawed ->samagon, ConANDave, mike, edscholl, Andrew, Mike Schwartz
Response:
Automatic V6 Mustangs. No 1999 autos tested. -=1998=- Jason C. Watts (G-Tech) 16.03 sec. ChuckSD (Carlsbad,CA Strip) 16.23 sec. -=1996=- Jack Howton (Houston Raceway Park) 16.49 sec. howton69 (Houston Raceway Park) 16.64 sec. -=1994=- Garrett Billan (Viking Int’l Raceway) 16.21sec. AVERAGE = 16.29 sec. So we have established that a real world 1/4 mile time for the automatic is about 16.29 for the OLD V6. This isn’t the newly tuned V6. Anyhow. Lee Cao says his Accord is faster and get’s ‘low’ 16 sec. times. Well, so do the old V6’s. So now we have a problem. I don’t know what to think. Maybe if Lee put a quart of Rogaine into gas tank, he could do a better 1/4 mile time. Lee could say that he is not the only person that a got a 16 sec 1/4 mile time, but he’s also a client… (that didn’t make sense at all) Anyway. I really don’t have enough evidence to pass judgement on which car is faster. Lee has already passed judgement long ago and I expect that. But I simply don’t have enough evidence yet. How am I supposed to find real world Accord V6 times? I can’t so we will have to go by fantasy magazine reviews and Lee’s.. ehem.. real world claims. Bling Bling! See the ‘REALITY CHECK’ AD BY EIBACH! A MUST SEE! http://members.home.net/crush/reality-check Over 38,000 people educated! UPDATED! Honda Civic vs. Ford Mustang FAQ http://members.home.net/crush Smart ->Newbie Steve, Lee C, Brian Y. Cho, Clint Law, Alan Flawed ->samagon, ConANDave, mike, edscholl, Andrew, Mike Schwartz
Response:
Related Posts